Marg Appenate

What do you like best?

What do you dislike?

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

I was very taken with the overall vision of the product. The maturity of the platform, open interfaces, and workflow functionality are what made Appenate stand out from its competitors during our final evaluation process.

We were impressed by the easy-to-use dynamic screens Appenate has available which can be used to create Forms and intuitive, data-driven applications. The affordable per user pricing was an added plus.

The company's time tracking process is now much more stable, efficient and fail-safe.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

My initial concerns when embarking on this project was to find a platform that is stable, reliable, and capable of handling a large number of accounts. I'm happy that Appenate has ticked all of these boxes.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

At approximately 80 branches across the country with more than 8000 employees, digital transformation, process effectiveness, and mobility had become the mandate for our various ICT departments.

My team was tasked with sourcing a flexible mobile forms solution that required little or no programming skills, and a pay per user licensing model.

Unique Personalservice has deployed Appenate apps to their field-based temporary workers as well as their permanent office-based staff.

We are currently using Appenate for time management of temporary workers, and updating database items like client street addresses, telephone numbers, etc. In future, we will use Appenate to handle activities like leave requests and other more complex employee-specific processes.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

Great consistency in the overall product, user experience and customer service.

Ease-Of-Use
Functionality
Continuous Feature Development
Great Customer Service
Affordable Pricing Structure

There’s been a great reduction in time preparing audits and audit reports as well as standardising the auditing process.

Great service, good feature improvements.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

N/A

What features/services would you like to see in future versions of this product?

N/A

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We set out to find a mobile solution which could contribute towards process standardization and, through this, a reduction in time efforts with regard to report preparation.

Our team had quite a few business process application platforms to consider and try out, one of which was Appenate.

Heidelberg uses Appenate as an auditing tool within its consulting departments.
Employees use apps created on the Appenate platform to audit performance-related activities of our various printing presses.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

I was very taken with the overall vision of the product. The maturity of the platform, open interfaces, and workflow functionality are what made Appenate stand out from its competitors during our final evaluation process.

We were impressed by the easy-to-use dynamic screens Appenate has available which can be used to create Forms and intuitive, data-driven applications. The affordable per user pricing was an added plus.

The company's time tracking process is now much more stable, efficient and fail-safe.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

My initial concerns when embarking on this project was to find a platform that is stable, reliable, and capable of handling a large number of accounts. I'm happy that Appenate has ticked all of these boxes.

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

At approximately 80 branches across the country with more than 8000 employees, digital transformation, process effectiveness, and mobility had become the mandate for our various ICT departments.

My team was tasked with sourcing a flexible mobile forms solution that required little or no programming skills, and a pay per user licensing model.

Unique Personalservice has deployed Appenate apps to their field-based temporary workers as well as their permanent office-based staff.

We are currently using Appenate for time management of temporary workers, and updating database items like client street addresses, telephone numbers, etc. In future, we will use Appenate to handle activities like leave requests and other more complex employee-specific processes.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes

PROS & CONS

What are the best aspects of this product?

Great consistency in the overall product, user experience and customer service.

Ease-Of-Use
Functionality
Continuous Feature Development
Great Customer Service
Affordable Pricing Structure

There’s been a great reduction in time preparing audits and audit reports as well as standardising the auditing process.

Great service, good feature improvements.

What aspects are problematic or could work better?

N/A

What features/services would you like to see in future versions of this product?

N/A

What specific problems in your company were solved by this product?

We set out to find a mobile solution which could contribute towards process standardization and, through this, a reduction in time efforts with regard to report preparation.

Our team had quite a few business process application platforms to consider and try out, one of which was Appenate.

Heidelberg uses Appenate as an auditing tool within its consulting departments.
Employees use apps created on the Appenate platform to audit performance-related activities of our various printing presses.

Are you a current user of this product?

Yes